Passage Excerpt from “Research Riddle Resolved”
Excerpt from “Research Riddle Resolved”
For centuries, scientists were confounded by an animal that seemed to look and act like a combination of a bird, a reptile, and a mammal. It has a bill like a duck and lays eggs but produces milk for its young. It lives in a burrow, has fur, and can make venom. We now know that this animal is called a duck-billed platypus. A platypus is a monotreme, a type of egg-laying mammal.
Hundreds of years after the first sightings of the platypus, the animal still captures our imagination anew and irresistibly attracts the attention of science writers everywhere. The May 2008 Nature report detailing the DNA insides of the duck-billed platypus invited colorful tales from just about every mainstream media outlet.
But cuteness and weirdness aside, the platypus research results are a gold mine for medical researchers. The findings cement what may have seemed totally obvious but turned out to be a bit of a scientific surprise: platypus DNA is a patchwork of genes from reptiles, birds, and mammals.
Evolution Fusion
In other words, the platypus heritage is laid out in an evolutionary DNA tapestry that marks the time, hundreds of millions of years ago, when reptiles and mammals branched off the evolutionary tree.
So what? The platypus is nothing like a human, so what can its DNA tell us about people and the diseases we get?
Plenty, says an international team of scientists who did this work.
The platypus genome results are far more than confirmation of a scientific oddity. They provide researchers a window into a time in history when mammals became unique—gaining the ability to bear live young, produce milk for them, and grow a warm, furry coat.
That’s important because our own, modern-day genomes are still a big mystery and researchers need much more information to be able to translate our genetic language into useful health knowledge.
One of the ways scientists can decipher meaning from within our 3 billion DNA “letters,” or nucleotides, is to compare human genes with those from animals, to see what has been kept the same and what has evolved to be different. . . .
Same and Different
In an approach called comparative genomics, scientists compare the genome sequences of several species: human, mouse, and a wide variety of other organisms from single-celled fungi to elephants and, now, the platypus.
The goal of this research is to find regions of similarity and difference in order to better understand the structure and function of human genes.
Comparative genomics is directly related to evolution because all living things share a common ancestor. By using computer tools to examine genes that have been kept the same in many organisms over millions of years, researchers can locate signals that control how genes work. This information may translate into ways to understand, treat, and prevent human diseases. . . .
Chicken or Egg?
When researchers analyzed platypus DNA and compared it to that of chickens, snakes, and lizards, the findings traced the evolutionary path from birds and reptiles to mammals. They learned that the platypus lost most of its genetic ability to produce egg yolk—as compared to chicken genes. This suggests its departure from “chicken-ness.”
But, through evolutionary change, the platypus gained the ability to make milk that is rich in nutrients. Platypuses have genes that make the milk protein casein: just like we do.
A male platypus can, like its ancestral snake and lizard cousins, produce venom. The platypus ejects this venom through special glands in its back legs. The evolutionary reason for maintaining such molecular weaponry isn’t yet clear, but what is fascinating is that it appears nature mixed and matched together DNA pieces separately to create the venom genes in reptiles and monotremes like the platypus.
The scientific value of pinning genetics to physiological function—like milk production—is high. Such investigations may help medical researchers understand health issues related to reproduction and lactation. Although lactation is an ancient reproductive trait, mammals—including the platypus—are unique in their ability to produce milk that is extraordinarily nutritious, containing a rich blend of sugars, fats, and proteins.
More generally, though, studying how nature cuts and pastes gene modules gives scientists an inside scoop on how genetic changes relate to health and disease risk.
One thing is clear—the stunning blend of reptile, bird, and mammal puts the platypus in a class of its own, and it gives researchers much more: information about how mammals like us came about.
[Scientists’] genetic sleuthing of platypuses, chimps, fish, sunflowers—you name it—continues to teach scientists how millions of years of evolution progressed. This provides vital information to understanding the role of genes in the health and disease of mammals like us and our pets, and can also help preserve our rich and diverse planet.
From “Research Riddle Resolved”—Public Domain/National Institutes of Health
Question
Read this sentence from paragraph 2.
But cuteness and weirdness aside, the platypus research results are a gold mine for medical researchers.
The sentence contributes to the overall structure of the excerpt by
- Ashifting the focus of the excerpt from the platypus’s unique appearance to its physiology.
- Bhighlighting how the platypus’s unusual appearance has attracted scientists’ attention.
- Crevealing current ideas about the genetic background of the platypus.
- Dintroducing the platypus’s scientific significance that the rest of the excerpt develops.
Show the answer
Correct answer: D
The question asks how the sentence from paragraph 2 contributes to the overall structure of the excerpt.
A. Incorrect. While the sentence from paragraph 2 does mention the platypus’s unique appearance, the remainder of the excerpt does not focus on the physiology of the platypus but instead focuses on the significance of scientists’ platypus research and what it can “tell us about people” (paragraph 4).
B. Incorrect. Paragraph 1 discusses the platypus as the “duck-billed” animal that “still captures our imagination anew and irresistibly attracts the attention of science writers everywhere,” but highlighting the idea that the platypus’s unusual appearance has attracted scientists’ attention is not how the sentence from paragraph 2 fits into the overall structure of the excerpt.
C. Incorrect. Paragraph 1 states that “the May 2008 Nature report detailing the DNA insides of the duck-billed platypus invited colorful tales from just about every mainstream media outlet,” but it does not discuss current ideas in the field. Paragraph 2 focuses on the “scientific surprise” of the platypus.
D. CORRECT. The sentence from paragraph 2 serves as a transition from the introductory idea that “the animal still captures our imagination anew and irresistibly attracts the attention of science writers everywhere” (paragraph 1) to the central idea that the platypus has great scientific significance.
Question analysis
This text-structure question on “Research Riddle Resolved,” a National Institutes of Health article about what the platypus’s DNA reveals, quotes the sentence that calls the research results “a gold mine for medical researchers.” Students decide how the sentence contributes to the excerpt’s overall structure, and the choices offer roles that sound alike, so a clear picture of how the article unfolds is needed.
- Grade level
- Grade 8 reading and task
- Compared with grade 7
- At grade 7 Explaining how a sentence fits a text’s structure is regular grade 7 work. This sentence opens paragraph 2 of a science article full of terms such as “genome” and “comparative genomics,” and its role has to be judged against the excerpt as a whole.
- Estimated difficulty
- Moderate: several steps, or a close reading with one strong distractor.
- Thinking it demands
- Depth of knowledge 2, skills and concepts · mainly analyze
- What makes it hard
- How, not what moderate
- Hard words moderate
- Evidence in several places minor
- Evidence
- Answered from the whole text
- Reading level
- Passage: about grade 11, 809 words; question and choices: about grade 11, 78 words.
- Corrected from the DOE handbook
- A missing hyphen in a quotation in the explanation was restored.
- Students, last 30 days
- Not enough answers yet to show (it takes 10).
Why it is hard, traps and wrong answers (shows the answer)
Why it is hard
The sentence announces its own turn with “But … aside,” so most students sense that it moves away from the platypus’s oddness. Points are lost on where it moves to: one choice gets the turn right but names the wrong destination, and two others credit the sentence with what paragraphs 1 and 2 say around it. The question rewards reading the sentence as a signpost for the rest of the article rather than as one more fact about the animal.
How, not what moderate Working it out
The stem asks what the sentence does for the whole excerpt, so students must see “But … aside” turning from the animal’s public appeal in paragraph 1 to its value for science, the subject of every later section. (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001)
Hard words moderate Understanding the question
One choice turns on “physiology,” how a body works, and a student who takes it to mean the animal’s biology in general cannot tell that the excerpt goes on to its DNA instead. (Perfetti, 2007; Freedle & Kostin, 1993)
Evidence in several places minor Working it out
Confirming that the sentence opens the excerpt’s main subject means checking what follows, from paragraph 4’s question “what can its DNA tell us about people” to the health payoffs of paragraphs 15–18. (Kirsch & Mosenthal, 1990; Gorin & Embretson, 2006)
Strategy: Sum up paragraph 1 in a phrase and the main subject of the paragraphs after the sentence in another, then test each choice’s description of the sentence against both.
Traps
- Half right: One half of a two-part choice is right and the other is not.
- Wrong part of the text: A choice is true of another paragraph, stanza or speaker than the one asked about.
- Word match: Repeats striking words or phrases from the text, so it looks supported, but its meaning does not fit the question.
The wrong answers, classified
A Half right (King et al., 2004; Thissen, Steinberg & Fitzpatrick, 1989)
Rightly sees the turn away from the animal’s cuteness and weirdness, but the excerpt goes on to its DNA and what it can teach about human health, not to how its body works.
B Word match (Freedle & Kostin, 1993)
Echoes paragraph 1’s platypus that “irresistibly attracts the attention of science writers,” but those are writers, not scientists, and the quoted sentence sets the animal’s looks aside rather than highlighting them.
C Wrong part of the text (Kirsch & Mosenthal, 1990)
Credits the sentence with the finding reported right after it, that platypus DNA is “a patchwork of genes,” though this sentence only says the results are valuable to medical researchers.
What was corrected from the DOE handbook, and why
- Explanation: The handbook’s explanation of Option C quotes paragraph 1 as “the May 2008 Nature report detailing the DNA insides of the duckbilled platypus.” The passage says “duck-billed,” as its introduction and the explanation of Option B do, so the site now quotes it that way.
Working it out, step by step
Figure out what the question asks
This is a structure question. It asks what job one sentence does for the whole excerpt. So look at what comes before the sentence and at what comes after it.
Look before the sentence
Paragraph 1 is about how people react to the platypus. It says the animal “still captures our imagination anew and irresistibly attracts the attention of science writers everywhere.” News outlets told “colorful tales” about it. So paragraph 1 is about how fun and strange the animal seems.
Read the sentence closely
The sentence begins “But cuteness and weirdness aside.” Aside means set to one side. So the writer stops talking about how odd the platypus is. Then the sentence calls the research results “a gold mine for medical researchers.” A gold mine is a source of great value. So the sentence says the platypus matters to science.
Look after the sentence
The rest of the excerpt explains that value. Paragraph 4 asks “what can its DNA tell us about people and the diseases we get?” Paragraph 11 says comparing genes may help “understand, treat, and prevent human diseases.” So the sentence opens the main topic of the excerpt.
Check each choice
- A does not fit. It is right that the sentence turns away from looks. But the excerpt moves on to the animal’s DNA and human health. It is not mainly about physiology, which means how a body works.
- B does not fit. Paragraph 1 says the platypus attracts “science writers,” not scientists. And this sentence sets the looks aside.
- C does not fit. The genes come up in the next sentence. This sentence only says the results are valuable.
- D fits. The sentence names the platypus’s value to science, and the rest of the excerpt builds on it.
Watch out: A gets the turn right but names the wrong place it turns to.
Choose the answer
The sentence turns from the animal’s oddness to its value for science. The rest of the excerpt develops that value. So the answer is D.
Why this answer and not the closest wrong one
A is the closest wrong choice. A and D both see the turn away from “cuteness and weirdness.” But A says the excerpt turns to physiology, how the platypus’s body works. In fact, it turns to what the platypus’s DNA can teach about people and disease. D names that: the animal’s value to science.
More questions like this
The original DOE question

The passage “Excerpt from “Research Riddle Resolved”” as printed (pages 66–67)

