Uncovering the Past

2018 Handbook

2018 Test B English · Question 36 of 57

Passage Uncovering the Past

Uncovering the Past

Archaeology as a distinct branch of science is only about two centuries old. The first archaeological activities focused largely on the search for clues about earlier human societies. In the nineteenth century, most archaeologists were amateurs trained in ancient languages and history. Many were art historians whose interest lay in the artwork and monuments of ancient civilizations. For the most part, their excavations were aimed at uncovering and removing priceless artwork and other valuable artifacts for museum display. Collectively, these early archaeologists are now considered traditional archaeologists.

Today, however, there is a different approach to archaeology, one that tries to reconstruct the everyday life of people in ancient times by applying the scientific methods of a range of specialized fields. Modern archaeologists take full advantage of available technology. Laptop computers enable digging teams to record their finds at each level of an excavation. With sketchpad computer software, archaeologists can draw their finds in the field. Three-dimensional computer modeling enables researchers to create floor plans and elevations for the structures they uncover. Archaeologists can also use remote sensing technologies such as radar and lidar, which is similar to radar but it uses laser light instead of radio waves. These technologies enable scientists to detect traces of early settlements that are not visible to the human eye.

The excavations at Kourion, a Roman port city on the island of Cyprus in the Mediterranean Sea, serve as an example of the modern approach. Portions of Kourion had been unexpectedly buried by a massive earthquake in the fourth century A.D. Traditional archaeologists were interested primarily in the remains of Kourion’s theater, temple, and classical monuments. They also collected precious objects, such as jewelry, found in nearby tombs. Modern archaeologists, however, have focused their studies and excavations on the settlement itself. This preserved seaport has proved to be a gold mine of important information about everyday life sixteen centuries ago.

During one excavation of a house at Kourion, for example, forensic anthropologists were able to reconstruct the skeleton of a young girl, whom they called Camelia. On the basis of her teeth, they determined her age to be about thirteen, although measurement of her skeleton showed that she was only the size of a modern eleven-year-old. The study of the teeth also confirmed her sex and pointed to her excellent health; Camelia had no cavities. Even after centuries, the forensic scientists could study the physical evidence in ways similar to those used in criminal investigations to determine the circumstances of Camelia’s death.

Other specialists on this excavation included a zooarchaeologist, who identified animal remains, including the skeleton of a mule found near Camelia. Another specialist, a paleobotanist, studied the contents of a bake oven at the site and identified four domesticated grains among the charred crumbs—evidence of a kind of ancient multigrain bread.

Although the archaeologists at this site unearthed a few beautiful items, the excavation did not uncover any priceless artwork for museums. Nonetheless, the archaeological processes used in Kourion have given us a valuable insight into everyday life in a Roman city.

Question

As described in paragraphs 4–5, what did the archaeological team learn about life in Kourion?

  • APeople in Kourion had a better diet than people have today.
  • BPeople in Kourion kept a wide variety of domesticated animals.
  • CPeople in Kourion had a shorter life expectancy than people have today.
  • DPeople in Kourion made bread from various domesticated grains.
Show the answer

Correct answer: D

The question asks what archaeologists learned about the ancient culture based on the evidence found in paragraphs 4–5. Paragraph 5 states that a paleobotanist identified four domesticated grains within a bake oven at the site, which supports Option D.

Option A is incorrect because there is not enough evidence in either paragraph to support the broad assumption that people in Kourion had a better diet than people today.

Option B is incorrect because the passage mentions the discovery of the remains of only one domesticated animal, which does not support the idea that Kourion people kept a wide variety of domesticated animals.

Option C is incorrect because paragraph 4 states that Camelia’s age was determined to be about thirteen at the time of her death, but since her death was likely caused by a natural disaster, the suggestion that all Kourion people had a shorter life expectancy than people today is not supported.

Question analysis

Students find what the archaeological team learned about everyday life in ancient Kourion from the paragraphs about Camelia’s skeleton and the other specialists in “Uncovering the Past.” The tricky part is telling a fact the passage states from a bigger claim that a few clues might seem to suggest.

NYS standards
  • 7R1 textual evidence and inferences
Grade level
Grade 6 reading and task
Compared with grade 7
Below grade 7 Below typical grade 7 demand: the answer rests on one stated detail, much like a grade 6 key-detail question, and the relevant paragraphs are short and concrete.
Estimated difficulty
Routine: one familiar step, little to misread.
Evidence
Answered from several paragraphs or stanzas
Reading level
Passage: about grade 13, 514 words; question and choices: about grade 8, 56 words.
Students, last 30 days
Not enough answers yet to show (it takes 10).
Why it is hard, traps and wrong answers (shows the answer)

Why it is hard

The answer is stated almost word for word at the end of paragraph 5, where the grains are called “evidence of a kind of ancient multigrain bread.” The wrong choices stretch real details, Camelia’s healthy teeth, her early death and a single mule, into claims about a whole population. Students who separate what the team found from what a reader might guess rarely miss it.

  1. Every choice must be checked minor Choosing the answer

    Three choices compare Kourion with today or generalize from one find, so each has to be traced back to paragraphs 4 and 5 to see whether the team actually learned it. (Embretson & Wetzel, 1987)

  2. Evidence in several places minor Working it out

    The facts are split between two paragraphs: Camelia’s age, size and teeth in paragraph 4, and the mule and the bake oven in paragraph 5, where the bread detail closes the paragraph. (Kirsch & Mosenthal, 1990; Gorin & Embretson, 2006)

Strategy: Reread the paragraphs about Camelia and the other specialists, list each fact actually stated about how people lived, and choose the one choice that appears on your list.

Traps

The wrong answers, classified

How the questions are analyzed, and the research behind it

Working it out, step by step

  1. Figure out what the question asks

    This is a key-details question. It asks what the team actually learned about daily life in Kourion. Look only at paragraphs 4 and 5. The right answer will be stated there, not guessed.

  2. List the facts in paragraphs 4 and 5

    Paragraph 4 is about Camelia. She was about thirteen, small for her age, and healthy, with no cavities. Paragraph 5 names two more experts. A zooarchaeologist found “the skeleton of a mule found near Camelia.” A paleobotanist studied a bake oven. This expert found “four domesticated grains among the charred crumbs—evidence of a kind of ancient multigrain bread.”

  3. Explain the hard words

    A paleobotanist studies plants from long ago. “Domesticated” grains are grains that people grew on farms, like wheat. “Charred” means burned black. “Multigrain” bread is made from more than one kind of grain. So the burned crumbs show that people in Kourion baked bread from several farm grains.

  4. Check each choice

    • A is wrong. Camelia had healthy teeth, but the passage never compares her diet with ours.
    • B is wrong. The team found one mule. One animal is not “a wide variety.”
    • C is wrong. Life expectancy means how long people usually live. One girl who died young cannot show that.
    • D fits. It matches the bake oven and its four grains.
  5. Choose the answer

    Only one choice is stated in the passage: bread made from four farm grains. So the answer is D, “People in Kourion made bread from various domesticated grains.”

Why this answer and not the closest wrong one

A, B and C each take one find and stretch it into a rule about everyone. Ask yourself how many examples back each one up. One girl or one mule is not enough. D needs no stretch, since paragraph 5 calls the crumbs “evidence of a kind of ancient multigrain bread.”

The original DOE question

Question 36 as printed on page 140 of the DOE handbook.
As printed in the DOE’s Specialized High Schools Student Handbook 2018–2019, page 140, question 36. Open page 140 of the handbook (PDF) The handbook letters this question’s choices E–H; here they are A–D (E = A, F = B, G = C, H = D).
The passage “Uncovering the Past” as printed (page 138)The passage “Uncovering the Past” as printed on page 138 of the DOE handbook.