Passage The Year without a Summer
The Year without a Summer
The eruption of the Philippine volcano Mount Pinatubo in June 1991 sent a huge cloud of gas and dust encircling the globe. The dust and ash from Mount Pinatubo was blamed for a two-year decrease in global temperature, changes in weather patterns, and damage to the ozone layer. The situation brings to mind a time now remembered as “The Year without a Summer,” a meteorological event that occurred 175 years earlier. At that time, harsh weather conditions plagued much of eastern North America and, to a lesser extent, northern Europe.
April 1816 brought typical spring weather to upstate New York and New England; trees budded, and farmers prepared to plow and plant. In May, however, the expected warm temperatures failed to arrive. Most people remained optimistic, waiting for the summer that was “just around the corner.” They waited in vain. During the first week of June, ten inches of snow fell on New England. Throughout the month, temperatures rarely rose above the 30s. Many farmers replanted crops several times, only to see them stunted or destroyed by sleet, hail, and icy winds. July and August brought little improvement. During most days the temperature stayed in the 40s. Farmers’ diaries document the farmers’ daily struggles with near-freezing temperatures, failing crops, and dying farm animals. The few crops that managed to survive were killed by frost in mid-September. Winter came early in New England and was unusually severe. Even the South was affected; on July 4, the high temperature for Savannah, Georgia, was only 46 degrees Fahrenheit!
Some religious leaders warned their congregations that the unusual weather meant that the end of the world was drawing near. Other leaders attributed the cool weather to unusual sunspot activity. The proliferation of the newly invented lightning rod was also blamed as some people believed that lightning rods had interrupted the natural temperature balance of Earth, causing the cooler temperatures.
It was not until October that the first plausible explanation for “The Year without a Summer” was suggested. Friedrich Bessel, a German astronomer, reported seeing thick clouds of dust in the upper atmosphere. He theorized that these dust particles screened portions of Earth from the warming rays of the sun. It was discovered that in April 1815, Mount Tambora, an Indonesian volcano, had erupted with such force that it had sent an estimated 100 cubic miles of fine dust into the atmosphere. Witnesses to the eruption reported that the sky remained dark for two days. The dust then rose high into the stratosphere, where it encircled the world for several years to come.
Skeptics in 1816 doubted that a faraway volcano could steal their summer. However, most present-day researchers believe Bessel’s explanation to be generally correct, demonstrating the global nature of weather. The dust in the atmosphere eventually settled, and the spring of 1817 was back to normal.
Question
Which of the following is implied by the phrase “the global nature of weather” (paragraph 5)?
- AUnderstanding weather events around the world is important for making weather predictions.
- BExtreme weather conditions in some parts of the world can have a lasting impact on a geographical area.
- CNatural disasters tend to occur in different parts of the world at the same time.
- DConditions in one part of the world can affect weather in another part of the world.
Show the answer
Correct answer: D
The answer is (D)
The question asks for the implied meaning behind the phrase “the global nature of weather” (paragraph 5). This phrase refers to how conditions in one part of the world can affect weather in another part of the world.
Option D is correct because it clarifies “global” by explaining the relationship between weather and conditions all over the world. Option A is incorrect because the phrase in paragraph 5 is about the effects of weather conditions around the world, not about making weather predictions.
Option B is incorrect because it discusses the lasting impact on specific geographical areas, while the phrase “the global nature of weather” refers to events that affect the entire world.
Option C is incorrect because, while weather events (the unusually cold summer in New England in 1816) can be related to natural disasters (a volcano eruption), there is no support in the passage for the idea that natural disasters tend to occur at the same time.
Question analysis
This question about word meaning in context asks what the phrase “the global nature of weather” implies in the final paragraph of “The Year without a Summer.” Students have to work out its meaning from the events the passage has described, not from a general sense of the word “global.”
- Grade level
- Grade 7 reading and task
- Compared with grade 7
- At grade 7 Determining a phrase's meaning from context is standard grade 7 work. The phrase draws on the passage's main explanation, which is clearly laid out, so the demand is typical for grade 7.
- Estimated difficulty
- Straightforward: two steps or one careful reading.
- Thinking it demands
- Depth of knowledge 2, skills and concepts · mainly understand
- What makes it hard
- Reading between the lines moderate
- Evidence in several places minor
- A very close wrong answer minor
- Evidence
- Answered from several paragraphs or stanzas
- Reading level
- Passage: about grade 9, 469 words; question and choices: about grade 9, 76 words.
- Students, last 30 days
- Not enough answers yet to show (it takes 10).
Why it is hard, traps and wrong answers (shows the answer)
Why it is hard
“Global” alone suggests anything worldwide, and the wrong choices offer several worldwide-sounding ideas: forecasting, lasting local damage, simultaneous disasters. The phrase means something narrower, that what happens in one place can change the weather far away, as Tambora did to New England. Students who read the phrase in its sentence, where it is what Bessel's explanation demonstrates, find the key; those who define the word in isolation do not.
Reading between the lines moderate Working it out
The phrase must be read through the example the passage just gave: an Indonesian volcano filled the stratosphere with dust and New England lost its summer. (Graesser, Singer & Trabasso, 1994; Kintsch, 1998)
Evidence in several places minor Working it out
The meaning depends on facts from paragraph 4, Tambora's location and its dust circling the world, and from paragraph 2, snow in New England, not on paragraph 5 alone. (Kirsch & Mosenthal, 1990; Gorin & Embretson, 2006)
A very close wrong answer minor Choosing the answer
B and D are worded almost alike, conditions in some part of the world affecting somewhere; they differ in what is affected, since B makes it a lasting impact on one area rather than weather elsewhere. (Embretson & Wetzel, 1987; Gorin & Embretson, 2006; Ascalon et al., 2007)
Strategy: Reread the sentence with the phrase and the paragraph before it, ask what Bessel's explanation demonstrated, and choose the paraphrase that fits that example.
Traps
- Outside knowledge: A choice is plausible in the real world but not supported by this text.
- Dictionary meaning, not meaning here: A common meaning of the word that does not fit its use in this text.
The wrong answers, classified
A Outside knowledge (King et al., 2004; Recht & Leslie, 1988)
Offers a sensible real-world point about forecasting, but the passage never discusses predicting weather; the phrase is about cause and effect across distance.
B Twists what the text says (King et al., 2004)
Keeps the idea of extreme events having effects but makes them local and lasting, dropping the link between distant places that “global” refers to here.
C Dictionary meaning, not meaning here (Perfetti, 2007)
Reads “global” as disasters striking many places at once, though the passage's two eruptions were more than 170 years apart and one caused effects far away.
Working it out, step by step
Figure out what the question asks
This asks what a phrase implies, or hints at. Read the phrase in its sentence, not by itself.
Read the phrase in its sentence
Paragraph 5 says researchers “believe Bessel’s explanation to be generally correct, demonstrating the global nature of weather.”
So Bessel’s explanation is the example. Recall it. In 1815, a volcano in Indonesia erupted. Its dust spread around the world. In 1816, New England had snow in June.
Work out what it means
Global means having to do with the whole world. Indonesia is in Asia, very far from New England. Yet the eruption there changed the weather in America. So the phrase means that something in one part of the world can change the weather in a faraway part.
Check each choice
- A The passage never talks about predicting weather.
- B It keeps the effects in one area. The point here is that effects travel far.
- C The two eruptions in the passage were 176 years apart. Nothing says disasters strike at the same time.
- D fits. Conditions in Indonesia changed the weather in New England.
Choose the answer
The phrase means events in one place can change the weather far away. So the answer is D.
Why this answer and not the closest wrong one
B is the closest trap, because it also says extreme conditions have effects. But B keeps those effects in one area. The passage’s example crosses the world: dust from Indonesia chilled New England. D names that link between faraway places.
More questions like this
The original DOE question

The passage “The Year without a Summer” as printed (page 76)
