Passage The Best Laid Plans of Ravens
The Best Laid Plans of Ravens
In Edgar Allan Poe’s poem “The Raven,” a raven visits a lonely man’s home and responds to the man’s pleading questions with only the word “nevermore.” The poem’s narrator interprets the word as a prediction of doom for his future. A talking, prophetic raven may seem to be the wild imaginings of the poet, but a new study published in the journal Science hints that one particular idea behind the poem might not be as far-fetched as it seems. For most of human history, people assumed that animals do not understand the passage of time in the same way people do. Some people believed that animals might remember events from the past and that instinct might drive them to make preparations in order to guarantee survival, but most people did not think that animals had the ability to plan. At Lund University in Sweden, researchers argue that ravens may be able to think ahead and even plan for the future.
It can be difficult to test an animal’s ability to plan because human observers must be certain they are not mistaking instinctual behavior for intentional planning. For example, many animals hoard food so that they will not run out later, but scientists who study animals would not call hoarding a decision to plan for the future. This action is merely instinctual. Cognitive scientists argue that in order for an animal’s behavior to qualify as preparing for the future, the animal must use specific decision-making skills to solve a problem.
To avoid mistaking instinctual behavior for evidence of decision-making, the Lund University researchers designed two experiments to test ravens’ ability to plan. Ravens belong to the corvid family, a group of birds known for their intelligence. A study in 2007 showed that corvids have the tendency to save only certain types of food, which suggests that they are planning for the future rather than acting on instinct. In order to investigate that theory, the researchers had to design experiments that would achieve results that could not be explained by an instinctual behavior of food hoarding. Therefore, the ravens were taught two behaviors that they do not normally perform in the wild.
For the first experiment, the researchers showed the birds how to use a small stone to open a box and get treats. Once the ravens learned the behavior, the researchers presented the birds with four stones. Only one stone was the right size to open the box. The birds learned to select that stone and set it aside until the researchers presented the box. The second experiment involved bartering. A researcher would trade the ravens a large treat for a bottle cap. Later, the researchers presented the ravens with a group of items, including small treats and the bottle cap. The ravens chose the bottle cap over the treats and waited for the original researcher to trade with them again so that they could get more treats. In both experiments, the ravens waited patiently for up to seventeen hours for the researcher to return.
The results of these experiments are exciting, but more evidence needs to be gathered before scientists can fully conclude that ravens can plan for the future. Some scientists argue that the ravens might be choosing the stone and bottle cap because the ravens have been trained to do so, not necessarily because the ravens are thinking ahead. Regardless, like other recent advances in animal science, these experiments show that ravens could be much smarter than first believed, and scientists now believe that ravens do actually think about their own future.
Question
How does paragraph 1 introduce the ideas that ravens may perceive time and plan for the future?
- AIt mentions a poem that considers whether a raven can see the future and then discusses why people have traditionally doubted that ravens have the ability to plan.
- BIt references a poem about a raven that seems to have insight into the future and then mentions new information that suggests ravens have the ability to plan.
- CIt mentions a poem that led people to believe that ravens are aware of the future and then explains why scientists want to study ravens’ ability to plan.
- DIt references a poem about a raven that predicts the future and then describes the importance of differentiating ravens’ instincts from their ability to plan.
Show the answer
Correct answer: B
The question asks how paragraph 1 introduces the ideas that ravens may perceive time and plan for the future.
A. Incorrect. While paragraph 1 states that people have historically believed that animals do not understand the passage of time, this statement is not the introduction to the idea that ravens may plan for the future.
B. CORRECT. Edgar Allan Poe’s poem features a raven that speaks in a prophetic way. Since prophecies are a prediction of the future, the statement suggests that the raven has a sense of time. This reference is then tied to a modern study where “researchers argue that ravens may be able to think ahead and even plan for the future” (paragraph 1).
C. Incorrect. Although the idea of a raven being aware of the future in the poem is tied to a study that “hints that one particular idea behind the poem might not be as far-fetched as it seems” (paragraph 1), this connection does not prove that the poem is what prompted scientists to conduct such a study.
D. Incorrect. Paragraph 1 introduces the idea “that ravens may be able to think ahead and even plan for the future” but does not explain in detail the importance of differentiating between whether ravens act on instinct or on their ability to plan.
Question analysis
This structure question asks how the opening paragraph of “The Best Laid Plans of Ravens,” an article on experiments testing whether ravens can plan ahead, introduces the ideas that ravens may perceive time and plan for the future. Edgar Allan Poe’s poem “The Raven” starts the paragraph, and the choices disagree about how the article uses the poem and what follows it.
- Grade level
- Grade 7 reading and task
- Compared with grade 7
- At grade 7 Saying how an introduction leads into an article’s subject is a standard grade 7 task, and this paragraph is only six sentences long. The choices are long and close in wording, so the task rewards exact reading more than any special skill.
- Estimated difficulty
- Moderate: several steps, or a close reading with one strong distractor.
- Thinking it demands
- Depth of knowledge 2, skills and concepts · mainly analyze
- What makes it hard
- How, not what moderate
- Every choice must be checked moderate
- A lot to read minor
- Evidence
- Answered from one paragraph or stanza
- Reading level
- Passage: about grade 11, 599 words; question and choices: about grade 13, 125 words.
- Corrected from the DOE handbook
- In the explanation of a wrong choice, a sentence that said paragraph 1 does not introduce an idea that it does introduce was corrected.
- Students, last 30 days
- Not enough answers yet to show (it takes 10).
Why it is hard, traps and wrong answers (shows the answer)
Why it is hard
Since every choice starts with the poem, the question is decided by what each says comes next. The sentences about what people long assumed of animals fill the middle of the paragraph and are easy to mistake for its point, though they give no reasons and concern animals in general. Students who note that the paragraph links Poe to the study only by the word “hints” avoid both the invented cause and the borrowed point about instinct.
How, not what moderate Working it out
The stem asks how paragraph 1 introduces its ideas, not what it says, so students must follow its path from Poe’s prophetic raven, through old beliefs about animals, to the Lund researchers’ claim. (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001)
Every choice must be checked moderate Choosing the answer
Each choice opens with Poe’s poem, described four slightly different ways, and then names a second move, so only testing both halves of every choice against the paragraph separates them. (Embretson & Wetzel, 1987)
A lot to read minor Understanding the question
Four choices of 25 to 28 words must be held against a dense six-sentence paragraph that moves from a poem to a journal study, then to long-held beliefs and a Swedish university. (Kintsch, 1998; Gorin & Embretson, 2006; Freedle & Kostin, 1993)
Strategy: Before looking at the choices, sum up paragraph 1 in two short phrases; then strike out every choice in which either half says something the paragraph does not.
Traps
- Wrong part of the text: A choice is true of another paragraph, stanza or speaker than the one asked about.
- Twists what the text says: Uses the text's topic and ideas but changes what it says: who did it, how much, when, or why.
- Reads too much in: A reasonable-sounding conclusion that goes further than the text allows.
The wrong answers, classified
A Twists what the text says (King et al., 2004)
Builds on the middle of the paragraph, where people long assumed animals could not plan, but no reasons are given, the claim covers animals generally, and Poe’s raven is treated as prophetic.
C Reads too much in (Graesser, Singer & Trabasso, 1994)
Credits the poem with making people think ravens sense the future, though the paragraph says people assumed the opposite, and it never says why scientists wanted to study ravens.
D Wrong part of the text (Kirsch & Mosenthal, 1990)
Sees instinct mentioned in paragraph 1 and assigns it paragraph 2’s point, that observers must be sure they are not mistaking instinctual behavior for intentional planning.
What was corrected from the DOE handbook, and why
- Explanation: The handbook’s explanation of Option A says “While paragraph 1 states that people have historically believed that animals do not understand the passage of time, this paragraph is not the introduction to the idea that ravens may plan for the future.” Paragraph 1 is that introduction: it ends “At Lund University in Sweden, researchers argue that ravens may be able to think ahead and even plan for the future,” and the question itself asks how paragraph 1 introduces the idea. What does not introduce it is the statement about people’s beliefs that the sentence has just named, which is the part of the paragraph Option A builds on, so the site now says “this statement is not the introduction to the idea.” The answer, B, is unchanged.
Working it out, step by step
Figure out what the question asks
This is a structure question. It asks how paragraph 1 leads into its ideas, not just what it says. Every choice begins with the poem and then names a second move. So test both halves of each choice against the paragraph.
See how the paragraph uses the poem
Paragraph 1 opens with Edgar Allan Poe’s poem “The Raven.” The man in the poem takes the raven’s word “as a prediction of doom for his future.” Doom means a terrible fate. The paragraph then calls the bird “a talking, prophetic raven.” Prophetic means able to tell the future. So the poem’s raven seems to know what is coming.
Follow the paragraph to its end
Next, a new study “hints that one particular idea behind the poem might not be as far-fetched as it seems.” Far-fetched means hard to believe. Then the paragraph tells what people long “assumed” about animals in general. Most people “did not think that animals had the ability to plan.” The last sentence turns to the new research: “researchers argue that ravens may be able to think ahead and even plan for the future.”
Check each choice
- A does not fit. The man in the poem does not wonder whether the raven sees the future. And the paragraph never says why people doubted that animals could plan.
- B fits. The poem’s raven seems to see the future. Then the paragraph reports new research suggesting that ravens can plan.
- C does not fit. The paragraph never says the poem changed what people believed. It never says why scientists want to study ravens, either.
- D does not fit. Telling instinct from planning is the subject of paragraph 2. Instinct is behavior an animal is born with.
Watch out: A is tempting because the middle of the paragraph does describe old beliefs. But that statement is not what brings in the idea that ravens may plan. The new study does.
Choose the answer
The paragraph moves from a raven that seems to know the future to a study suggesting that ravens may plan. So the answer is B.
Why this answer and not the closest wrong one
A is the closest wrong choice, since A and B both start with the poem. But A says the paragraph explains why people doubted that ravens could plan. The paragraph gives no reasons, and it speaks of animals in general. The planning idea comes in with the new study, which is the second half of B.
More questions like this
The original DOE question

The passage “The Best Laid Plans of Ravens” as printed (page 12)
