Passage Excerpt from “Research Riddle Resolved”
Excerpt from “Research Riddle Resolved”
For centuries, scientists were confounded by an animal that seemed to look and act like a combination of a bird, a reptile, and a mammal. It has a bill like a duck and lays eggs but produces milk for its young. It lives in a burrow, has fur, and can make venom. We now know that this animal is called a duck-billed platypus. A platypus is a monotreme, a type of egg-laying mammal.
Hundreds of years after the first sightings of the platypus, the animal still captures our imagination anew and irresistibly attracts the attention of science writers everywhere. The May 2008 Nature report detailing the DNA insides of the duck-billed platypus invited colorful tales from just about every mainstream media outlet.
But cuteness and weirdness aside, the platypus research results are a gold mine for medical researchers. The findings cement what may have seemed totally obvious but turned out to be a bit of a scientific surprise: platypus DNA is a patchwork of genes from reptiles, birds, and mammals.
Evolution Fusion
In other words, the platypus heritage is laid out in an evolutionary DNA tapestry that marks the time, hundreds of millions of years ago, when reptiles and mammals branched off the evolutionary tree.
So what? The platypus is nothing like a human, so what can its DNA tell us about people and the diseases we get?
Plenty, says an international team of scientists who did this work.
The platypus genome results are far more than confirmation of a scientific oddity. They provide researchers a window into a time in history when mammals became unique—gaining the ability to bear live young, produce milk for them, and grow a warm, furry coat.
That’s important because our own, modern-day genomes are still a big mystery and researchers need much more information to be able to translate our genetic language into useful health knowledge.
One of the ways scientists can decipher meaning from within our 3 billion DNA “letters,” or nucleotides, is to compare human genes with those from animals, to see what has been kept the same and what has evolved to be different. . . .
Same and Different
In an approach called comparative genomics, scientists compare the genome sequences of several species: human, mouse, and a wide variety of other organisms from single-celled fungi to elephants and, now, the platypus.
The goal of this research is to find regions of similarity and difference in order to better understand the structure and function of human genes.
Comparative genomics is directly related to evolution because all living things share a common ancestor. By using computer tools to examine genes that have been kept the same in many organisms over millions of years, researchers can locate signals that control how genes work. This information may translate into ways to understand, treat, and prevent human diseases. . . .
Chicken or Egg?
When researchers analyzed platypus DNA and compared it to that of chickens, snakes, and lizards, the findings traced the evolutionary path from birds and reptiles to mammals. They learned that the platypus lost most of its genetic ability to produce egg yolk—as compared to chicken genes. This suggests its departure from “chicken-ness.”
But, through evolutionary change, the platypus gained the ability to make milk that is rich in nutrients. Platypuses have genes that make the milk protein casein: just like we do.
A male platypus can, like its ancestral snake and lizard cousins, produce venom. The platypus ejects this venom through special glands in its back legs. The evolutionary reason for maintaining such molecular weaponry isn’t yet clear, but what is fascinating is that it appears nature mixed and matched together DNA pieces separately to create the venom genes in reptiles and monotremes like the platypus.
The scientific value of pinning genetics to physiological function—like milk production—is high. Such investigations may help medical researchers understand health issues related to reproduction and lactation. Although lactation is an ancient reproductive trait, mammals—including the platypus—are unique in their ability to produce milk that is extraordinarily nutritious, containing a rich blend of sugars, fats, and proteins.
More generally, though, studying how nature cuts and pastes gene modules gives scientists an inside scoop on how genetic changes relate to health and disease risk.
One thing is clear—the stunning blend of reptile, bird, and mammal puts the platypus in a class of its own, and it gives researchers much more: information about how mammals like us came about.
[Scientists’] genetic sleuthing of platypuses, chimps, fish, sunflowers—you name it—continues to teach scientists how millions of years of evolution progressed. This provides vital information to understanding the role of genes in the health and disease of mammals like us and our pets, and can also help preserve our rich and diverse planet.
From “Research Riddle Resolved”—Public Domain/National Institutes of Health
Question
Which sentence from the excerpt best supports the idea that the same DNA material results in the same traits even in different classes of animals?
- A“The findings cement what may have seemed totally obvious but turned out to be a bit of a scientific surprise: platypus DNA is a patchwork of genes from reptiles, birds, and mammals.” (paragraph 2)
- B“In other words, the platypus heritage is laid out in an evolutionary DNA tapestry that marks the time, hundreds of millions of years ago, when reptiles and mammals branched off the evolutionary tree.” (paragraph 3)
- C“The platypus is nothing like a human, so what can its DNA tell us about people and the diseases we get?” (paragraph 4)
- D“The evolutionary reason for maintaining such molecular weaponry isn’t yet clear, but what is fascinating is that it appears nature mixed and matched together DNA pieces separately to create the venom genes in reptiles and monotremes like the platypus.” (paragraph 14)
Show the answer
Correct answer: D
The question asks which sentence from the excerpt best supports the idea that the same DNA material results in the same traits even in different classes of animals.
A. Incorrect. The sentence from paragraph 2 describes the combination of DNA material from several classes of animals that makes up platypus DNA; however, the sentence does not address whether any of those different animals share traits or whether they share some of the same DNA.
B. Incorrect. The sentence from paragraph 3 emphasizes the relationship between two different classes of animals—reptiles and mammals—by discussing when they branched off the same evolutionary tree. However, the sentence does not address whether those classes of animals share any traits.
C. Incorrect. The sentence from paragraph 4 questions whether platypus DNA can teach people something about humans and human disease, which implies that there must be something in common between these two animals. However, it does not state that these two animals actually share traits or DNA.
D. CORRECT. The sentence from paragraph 14 describes two different classes of animals—reptiles and monotremes—that have the ability to create venom, a trait that resulted from the same DNA material “mixed and matched together.”
Question analysis
This textual evidence question on “Research Riddle Resolved” asks which quoted sentence best supports the idea that the same DNA material produces the same traits even in different classes of animals. The four long quotations come from paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 14 and all touch on platypus DNA, so a careful reading of what each one actually claims decides it.
- Grade level
- Grade 8 reading and task
- Compared with grade 7
- Above grade 7 Choosing the sentence that supports an idea is everyday grade 7 evidence work. Here the idea is abstract, and the four long quotations come from different parts of a technical article and must be decoded before they can be weighed.
- Estimated difficulty
- Among the hardest on the SHSAT: a non-obvious approach, heavy reading, or a well-hidden trap.
- Thinking it demands
- Depth of knowledge 3, strategic thinking · mainly evaluate
- What makes it hard
- A very close wrong answer major
- Reading between the lines moderate
- Hard words moderate
- Complex sentences minor
- Evidence
- Answered from several paragraphs or stanzas
- Reading level
- Passage: about grade 11, 809 words; question and choices: about grade 15, 154 words.
- Students, last 30 days
- Not enough answers yet to show (it takes 10).
Why it is hard, traps and wrong answers (shows the answer)
Why it is hard
The right sentence hides its support in unfamiliar words, while a wrong one says something close in plain language. A student must break the idea into three parts, shared DNA, a shared trait and two classes, and then translate “monotremes” and “molecular weaponry” to find all three in paragraph 14. The plain-spoken “patchwork” sentence covers two of the parts and draws students who never check for a trait, and the other two quotations attract by naming DNA and kinds of animals.
A very close wrong answer major Choosing the answer
The paragraph 2 quotation, platypus DNA as “a patchwork of genes from reptiles, birds, and mammals,” sounds like paragraph 14’s DNA pieces “mixed and matched”; only paragraph 14 names a trait two classes share, venom. (Embretson & Wetzel, 1987; Gorin & Embretson, 2006; Ascalon et al., 2007)
Reading between the lines moderate Working it out
No quotation states the idea; students must read “mixed and matched together DNA pieces” as the same material and venom as the same trait, while “separately” seems at first to point the other way. (Graesser, Singer & Trabasso, 1994; Kintsch, 1998)
Hard words moderate Understanding the question
“Monotremes” is defined only in the italic note before the article, as egg-laying mammals, and “molecular weaponry” points back to venom, so the right sentence names its two classes and its trait in words few students know. (Perfetti, 2007; Freedle & Kostin, 1993)
Complex sentences minor Understanding the question
The right quotation runs 39 words and delays its point behind a concession, “isn’t yet clear, but what is fascinating is that it appears nature mixed and matched.” (Abedi & Lord, 2001; Freedle & Kostin, 1993; Messick, 1989)
Strategy: Break the idea into its parts, the same DNA, the same trait and different classes of animals, and check each quotation for all three before choosing.
Traps
- Supports only part of the claim: In a question about evidence: a line that backs one half of the claim but not the other, or a related point rather than the claim itself.
- True but not the answer: A choice says something accurate about the text that does not answer this question.
The wrong answers, classified
A Supports only part of the claim (King et al., 2004; Thissen, Steinberg & Fitzpatrick, 1989)
Reads “a patchwork of genes from reptiles, birds, and mammals” as DNA shared across classes, which it nearly is, but the sentence names no trait that results from it.
B True but not the answer (King et al., 2004; Embretson & Wetzel, 1987)
Matches the idea’s DNA and two classes, reptiles and mammals, in the tapestry sentence, but it marks when the classes branched apart and says nothing about shared material or a shared trait.
C True but not the answer (King et al., 2004; Embretson & Wetzel, 1987)
Senses a link between species in paragraph 4’s question, but a question asserts nothing, and humans and platypuses are both mammals, not different classes.
Working it out, step by step
Figure out what the question asks
This asks which quotation best supports an idea. Break the idea into three parts: the same DNA material, the same trait, and different classes of animals. A trait is a feature, like fur or venom. A class is a big group of animals, such as mammals, birds or reptiles. The best quotation touches all three parts.
Decode the hard words in D
The quotation in D comes from paragraph 14. That paragraph says a male platypus can make venom, a kind of poison. So “molecular weaponry” means the venom. The note in italics at the start says “A platypus is a monotreme, a type of egg-laying mammal.” So monotremes are mammals. Reptiles, like snakes and lizards, are a different class.
Find the three parts in D
D says nature “mixed and matched together DNA pieces separately to create the venom genes in reptiles and monotremes like the platypus.” The trait is venom. The two classes are reptiles and mammals. In both, DNA pieces were put together to build venom genes. “Separately” does not say the DNA was different. It means the building happened on its own in each group.
Check each choice
- A does not fit. It says platypus DNA mixes genes from three classes. But it names no trait that those classes share.
- B does not fit. It tells when reptiles and mammals split apart. It says nothing about a shared trait.
- C does not fit. It is a question, so it states no fact. Also, humans and platypuses are both mammals, the same class.
- D fits. It names one trait, venom, built from DNA pieces in two classes.
Watch out: A is tempting because “a patchwork of genes” sounds like shared DNA. But look for a trait, and A has none.
Choose the answer
No quotation states the idea word for word. D comes closest, because it links DNA pieces to venom in two different classes. So the answer is D.
Why this answer and not the closest wrong one
A is the closest wrong choice. It shows that platypus DNA has genes from reptiles, birds and mammals. That covers the DNA and the classes. But A names no trait. D adds the missing part. Venom shows up in both reptiles and monotremes, and DNA pieces build the venom genes in each.
More questions like this
The original DOE question

The passage “Excerpt from “Research Riddle Resolved”” as printed (pages 66–67)

