Author: siteadmin

  • Foes of de Blasio’s high school integration plan spent close to $1M to quash it

    The Education Equity Campaign, a pro-test coalition which launched in February to counter the mayor’s plan, hired top firms Tusk Strategies, Bolton St. Johns and Patrick B. Jenkins & Associates to the tune of $80,000 total in May and June, according to the recent bimonthly filings with th犀利士 e state’s ethics watchdog. Those contracts cost them $65,000, according to filings from the previous March and April period.


    The campaign also dropped $395,000 in April and March on a media campaign that went through Tusk and included $50,000 for video production, $300,000 for digital advocacy, $30,000 for media advocacy and a $15,000 retainer payment to Bully Pulpit Interactive, a communications agency for brands, causes and candidates. That deal cost them $320,000 for the May and June period. The total pricetag for just Education Equity was roughly $860,000.

    https://www.politico.com/states/new-york/albany/story/2019/07/18/foes-of-de-blasios-high-school-integration-plan-spent-close-to-1m-to-quash-it-1108099

  • Thinking through gifted and talented education in New York City public schools: One parent’s reflection on the system

    How does the process work? Four-year-olds take a nationally normed standardized test (actually, two tests, the NNAT and the OLSAT, which are supposed to measure reasoning ability and general intellectual aptitude). No bubble sheets: It’s administered in person by an adult. Those above 90th percentile qualify for district programs. Those above 97th percentile qualify for citywide programs.


    Those are the technical qualification thresholds. In practice, you need a 99 to qualify for a citywide school and usually something like a 95 to qualify for a districtwide program, though it depends on the district.
    Once you get in the door as a kindergartener, you stay in the school or program through fifth grade (in the case of district programs) or eighth or 12th (in the case of citywide schools).

    If this strikes you as kind of nuts, well, that’s because it is: A test taken on one day as a 4-year-old, a test for which your parents can prepare you, can put you on one track, separate and apart from your peers, for your whole K-12 education.

    https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-thinking-through-gifted-and-talented-education-in-new-york-cit-20190712-ubme4h4b5zdu3izwpcr52nr7ta-story.html

  • Being black at Stuyvesant: Two students on what it’s like for African Americans at the specialized high school

    Just because students are intelligent enough to pass a test doesn’t mean they understand people who might be ethnically, racially or culturally different.


    That’s what happened to Gordon in his freshman biology class when his lab partner blamed him for the AIDS virus. Or when he was told to “go back to Africa” because he disagreed with some of his peers on the merits of the Specialized High Schools Admission Test (SHSAT).


    And both of us have repeatedly heard something along the lines of, “Black people don’t care about education.”


    While these stories may seem shocking or anachronistic, they are not unique among Stuy’s black and Latino students. Meetings of the Stuyvesant Black Students League and ASPIRA (the Hispanic student’s association) are animated by tales of students being called the N-word in and outside of class, threatened lynchings and other examples of almost-daily abuse.


    Constantly being reminded that we are not wanted in the school we attend is painful, and would obstruct any hardworking student from getting the education they deserve.

    https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-being-black-at-stuyvesant-20190629-zonvvyzykzdhlp2tknmd7urojq-story.html

  • GET RID OF THE SPECIALIZED HIGH SCHOOLS

    Excerpt from an interesting opinion on NYC specialized high schools. Do we need them? Why do we have them?…

    The very obvious solution to the specialized high schools’ diversity conundrum is here: get rid of the specialized high schools. They’re an ugly, embarrassing testament to America’s insistence upon inserting hierarchy into all things, including public services for children. What is the point of them? What, exactly, are we trying to accomplish here?


    For the New York City Department of Education, the covert purpose of the specialized high schools is to buy the acquiescence of ambitious families in underserved areas: these parents believe that huge swaths of the outer boroughs have no decent facilities for their kids, but the inadequacy of the school in their own neighborhood doesn’t trouble them so much because they’re focused on getting their child into Stuyvesant instead. For New Yorkers on the whole, the existence of Stuyvesant makes the perceived mediocrity of the zoned high schools conscionable: as long as every student has a fair chance to earn an escape, we can allow those who don’t to languish.


    Those who do escape receive the privilege of joining a hothouse of frantic academic competition, with its concomitant mental health crises. There’s little room for creativity or joy in learning. When students enter, they already tend to suffer from an undue focus on grades and test scores and the need to succeed at all costs (that’s how they got in), and thenceforth their universally like-minded peer group compounds the problem in an atmosphere of nonstop stress.

    There are other ways of looking at the world, other ways of perceiving life’s meaning, but Stuyvesant and Bronx Science are designed to ensure that their students are unlikely to encounter them. Proponents of diversity at the specialized high schools will never acknowledge that the specialized high schools inherently constitute a form of segregation, regardless of their racial demographics.


    For the ruling class, the racial diversity of the specialized high schools matters for reasons of public relations. The schools operate in the fashion of scholarship programs at top universities. Their function is to isolate and retrain the (supposedly) most talented kids from low-income neighborhoods and communities of color in order to make them eligible for high-level positions within America’s fake meritocracy, which uses the “diversity” generated by their compliant presence to make a case for its own legitimacy.


    What if we let the “smart” kids actually spend some time around the “normal” kids, even around the “dumb” kids? What if they learned to value solidarity instead of individual advancement? What if they came to understand that their entire communities matter, not just themselves?

    Read the entire article at http://www.star-revue.com/get-rid-of-the-specialized-high-schools/

  • The History of New York City’s Special High Schools

    A 2014 timeline of SHSAT related events.

    2014 – New York City Council Introduces Package of Legislation to Promote Diversity in City Schools
    On Wednesday, October 22nd, New York City Council members introduced one bill and two resolutions intended to build momentum around tackling diversity issues in New York City schools. According to recent reports, such as one released by the UCLA Civil Rights Project in March, local schools are among the most segregated in the country. The report states that in 2010, for example, of 32 school districts in New York City, 19 had ten percent or less white students.

    http://www.gothamgazette.com/government/5392-the-history-of-new-york-citys-special-high-schools-timeline

  • Elite High-School Debate Simmers as Albany Session Winds Down

    They got some relief Wednesday when Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie, a Bronx Democrat who attended Brooklyn Technical High School, told reporters he isn’t considering a deal to pass that bill in return for other changes, such as boosting gifted programs.


    “I think we should be looking to enrich our junior high-school students as we try to put them on the path to whether it’s a specialized high school or not,” Mr. Heastie said after meeting with New York City Schools Chancellor Richard Carranza. “We need to look at the system in totality, so I didn’t agree to any trades.”


    Assemblyman Michael Benedetto, a Bronx Democrat who chairs the Assembly education committee, said Wednesday night more than 50 fellow Democrats in his chamber debated the bill on ending the test in a closed-door evening conference, and it wasn’t clear what would happen next. “I don’t think it should be the role of the legislature to dictate to a particular school district how they determine admission to their own high schools,” he said in an interview.

    Heastie Quotes on the SHSAT

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/elite-high-school-debate-simmers-as-albany-session-winds-down-11560383381

  • FAIRNESS TO GIFTED GIRLS: ADMISSIONS TO NEW YORK CITY’S ELITE PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS

    A SHSAT research paper published in the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering.

    Jonathan Taylor
    Hunter College Gender Equity Project

    ABSTRACT

    The use of test scores in school admissions has been a contentious issue for decades. In New York City’s elite public high schools, it has been particularly controversial because of disproportionate representation by ethnicity. Underrepresentation of girls has received less attention. This research compared the predictive validity and gender bias of the admissions criterion, the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT), with that of seventh grade GPA, a possible additional criterion. SHSAT (r2 = 0.20) predicted high school grades less precisely than GPA7 (r2 = 0.44) and underpredicted girls’ grades in all academic domains and specific courses analyzed. Girls were overrepresented in the upper tail of STEM course grades. Simulated admissions using an index combining SHSAT and GPA7 suggest that different admissions criteria might improve the quality of the admitted cohort, increase diversity, and be gender-fair.

    http://www.dl.begellhouse.com/journals/00551c876cc2f027,294b56436594090b,2e036b8a364ae7df.html

  • An Improvement to the Mayor’s Current Proposal

    The mayor recently recommended a new specialized high school admissions procedure. Instead of a single exam, he’d like to identify the top 25% of NYC 8th grade students based on state score. Then from that group, make specialized high school offers to the top 7% of students from every school.

    A critic of the mayor’s reform plan is that the plan may make offers to students who are not proficient in either math or English. This is due to the fact that even when we sort NYC students by grade, the top 25% has students who haven’t earned proficient scores.

    Considering specialized high schools are accelerated, I believe it does make sense to only make offers to proficient students. Plus doing so only affects 10% of specialized high school offers.

    My proposed changes to the mayor’s proposal…

    1. Sort all middle schools by ENI ( highest to lowest Economic Need Index )
    2. Select all students who’ve earned 7th Grade proficiency in State exams. Allow schools to nominate alternates for special circumstances.
    3. Give offers to the top 1% of students in order of ENI
    4. Then give offers to the top 2% of students in order of ENI
    5. Then give offers to the top 3% of students in order of ENI
    6. Continue doing so until no seats are left

    This isn’t my ideal plan, but I think it’s a compromise that does fix a valid criticism of the current specialized high school admissions reform bill.

  • Dr. Jon Taylor Testifies at NYS Assembly Hearing on the SHSAT

    Dr. Jonathan Taylor’s testimony, without the following question and answer with elected officials.

    The entire seven hour hearing can be found here…